Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

iSDAsoil: soil stone content for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

Authors: Hengl, Tomislav; Miller, Matt; Križan, Josip; Kilibarda, Milan; Acquah, Gifty; Sila, Andrew M.;

iSDAsoil: soil stone content for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths

Abstract

iSDAsoil dataset soil stone content / coarse fragments log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as COG. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (iSDA points, AfSPDB, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as: Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. et al. African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. Sci Rep 11, 6130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version. Layer description: sol_log.wpg2_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil stone content mean value, sol_log.wpg2_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil stone content model (prediction) errors, Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (mlr::makeStackedLearner) for this variable indicates: Variable: log.wpg2 R-square: 0.709 Fitted values sd: 1.25 RMSE: 0.803 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -4.0555 -0.3113 -0.0222 0.2378 4.5794 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -0.008606 1.361982 -0.006 0.995 regr.ranger 0.972265 0.004443 218.854 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.034649 0.006404 5.411 6.3e-08 *** regr.cubist 0.069589 0.005229 13.308 < 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.012756 0.796535 -0.016 0.987 regr.cvglmnet -0.056645 0.005509 -10.283 < 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.8032 on 92785 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.7092, Adjusted R-squared: 0.7092 F-statistic: 4.525e+04 on 5 and 92785 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16 To back-transform values (y) to % use the following formula: % = expm1( y / 10 ) To submit an issue or request support please visit https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil

{"references": ["Hengl, T., Leenaars, J. G., Shepherd, K. D., Walsh, M. G., Heuvelink, G. B., Mamo, T., ... & Wheeler, I. (2017). Soil nutrient maps of Sub-Saharan Africa: assessment of soil nutrient content at 250 m spatial resolution using machine learning. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 109(1), 77-102.", "Hengl, T., MacMillan, R.A., (2019). Predictive Soil Mapping with R. OpenGeoHub foundation, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 370 pages, www.soilmapper.org, ISBN: 978-0-359-30635-0.", "Herrick, Jeffrey E. (2013): \"The Global Land-Potential Knowledge System (LandPKS): Supporting Evidence-based, Site-specific Land Use and Management through Cloud Computing, Mobile Applications, and Crowdsourcing.\" Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 5A-12A.", "Leenaars, J. G. B. (2014). Africa Soil Profiles Database, Version 1.2. A compilation of georeferenced and standardised legacy soil profile data for Sub-Saharan Africa (with dataset). Africa Soil Information Service (AfSIS) project (No. 2014/03). ISRIC-World Soil Information."]}

iSDA is a social enterprise with the mission to improve smallholder farmer profitability across Africa. iSDA builds on the legacy of the African Soils information service (AfSIS) project. We are grateful for the outputs generated by all former AfSIS project partners: Columbia University, Rothamsted Research, World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Quantitative Engineering Design (QED), ISRIC — World Soil Information, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ethiopia Soil Information Service (EthioSIS), Ghana Soil Information Service (GhaSIS), Nigeria Soil Information Service (NiSIS) and Tanzania Soil Information Service (TanSIS). More details on AfSIS partners and data contributors can be found at https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil

Related Organizations
Keywords

iSDA, Africa, coarse fragments, stone content, soil

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 31
    download downloads 68
  • 31
    views
    68
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
31
68