Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Based on a checklist that was developed during a workshop at OER Camp 2016 and presented as a Science 2.0 conference 2016 poster [1], we conducted an online survey among university teachers representing a sufficient variety of subjects. The survey was online from Feb 6th to March 3 rd 2017. We got 360 responses, whereof 210 were completes, see raw data [2]. The poster is presented at Open Science Conference, 21.-22.3.2017, Berlin. [1] Blümel, Ina, Heck, Tamara, Heise, Christian, Peters, Isabella, Scherp, Ansgar, & Weisel, Luzian. (2016). Science 2.0 & Open Science in Higher Education. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.376104 [2] Heck, Tamara, Blümel, Ina, Heller, Lambert, Mazarakis, Athanasios, Peters, Isabella, Scherp, Ansgar, & Weisel, Luzian. (2017). Survey: Open Science in Higher Education [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.400518
doi:10.5281/zenodo.400561
Open Science, Higher Education, Survey
Open Science, Higher Education, Survey
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 73 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts