Views provided by UsageCounts
Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation cover 1993 These data represent rangeland cover estimates determined by Jones et al. (2018) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app). Values are percent aerial cover of the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forbs and grasses Band 2 - bare ground Band 3 - litter Band 4 - perennial forbs and grasses Band 5 - shrubs Band 6 - trees No Data value = 255 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily intended for rangeland ecosystems. Cover estimates may not be suitable in other ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to: Jones, M. O., B. W. Allred, D. E. Naugle, J. D. Maestas, P. Donnelly, L. J. Metz, J. Karl, R. Smith, B. Bestelmeyer, C. Boyd, J. D. Kerby, and J. D. McIver. 2018. Innovation in rangeland monitoring: annual, 30 m, plant functional type percent cover maps for U.S. rangelands, 1984-2017. Ecosphere 9:e02430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2430
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts