Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Sygma
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

STRATEGY BUILDING FOR A KNOWLEDGE REPOSITORY WITH A NOVEL EXPERT INFORMATION FUSION TOOL

Authors: Skulimowski, Andrzej M.J.;

STRATEGY BUILDING FOR A KNOWLEDGE REPOSITORY WITH A NOVEL EXPERT INFORMATION FUSION TOOL

Abstract

Large digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) are an important component of Open Science. The latter is a challenging area of rapid technological and social development, where ICT innovations and their use cases are coordinated with research policy measures at different levels, from regional to European. DKR development is deeply rooted in the PEST environment and re­quires a thorough strategic plan of the social, economic and research impact over a mid to long-term perspective. It should also be aligned with technological progress, specifically in the emerging areas of Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Internet of Things, and Global Expert Systems. Despite of the aforementioned relevance, there exist very few publicly accessible DKR strategies or desc­riptions of strategy building approaches, and those available refer only to e-learning course reposi­tories. This has created a need to develop methodological foundations for DKR-oriented strategic planning, to build new ICT-based tools and collaborative approaches, and apply them to satisfy the project goals in the context of EU S&T policies. This paper reports the strategy building process for an innovative knowledge repository (referred to as the Platform) developed within the flagship Horizon 2020 project “Training towards a society of data-savvy inform­ation professionals to enable open leadership Innovation” (acronym MOVING, www.moving-project.eu), its methodological background and outcomes. Relevant input to the strategy results from a forward-looking activity focussed on the identification of internal and environmental factors influencing the future performance and impact of the Platform. It combines a four-round/real-time novel policy and decision Delphi survey with an impact model established with Anticipatory Networks. The forecasting model parameters are those delivered as outcomes of the survey. They are supplied by the project partners, or result from the project Description of Work. The survey results are then used in a final collaborative roadmapping on the Platform exploitation in the PEST context. The strategy building process presented here involves two stages. Stage 1 is devoted to establishing the boundary conditions for the Platform’s activity and user community building, while Stage 2 delivers the Final Strategy with plausible exploitation resulting scenarios. The second stage includes an action plan aimed at ensuring the Platform’s digital sustainability, financial viability and social acceptance. In this presentation of the DKR strategy building process, we will show in more detail the methodology of generating future visions of the Platform functioning with a flexi­ble Delphi survey support system that is based on a novel forward extrapolation methodology. It offers a variety of question and/or state­ment types, so­phi­sticated statistical analysis and other uncertainty handling methods, as well as a user-friendly interface. It can be run in various modes that suit the survey goals and gather expert knowledge in multiple rounds, as a real-time Delphi or as a hybrid of both. The cloud-based Delphi application is offe­red to the project team in SaaS mode, with some PaaS features (www.moving-survey.ipbf.eu). It can also be used as a ba­sis for designing further customised expert information retrieval and fusion exercises for a broad spectrum of research needs.

Available also from: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/fta2018-paper-c2-skulimowski.pdf

Keywords

Policy Delphi, Strategy building, Knowledge repositories, Information fusion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 8
    download downloads 5
  • 8
    views
    5
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
8
5
Green