Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this study, maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) were intercropped in different sowing densities and their monocropping equivalents and tested to determine the best intercropping system on forage yield and quality. Maize was cultivated alone 75 000 plants ha-1 (SM) and intercropped with cowpea as follows: 75 000 plants ha-1 of maize and 37 500 plants ha-1 of cowpea (MC1), 75 000 plants ha-1 of maize and 50 000 plants ha-1 of cowpea (MC2) and 75 000 plants ha-1 of maize and 75 000 plants ha-1 of cowpea (MC3), in rows alternating with maize. The highest dry matter yield was produced by MC3 (20.6 t ha-1), and the lowest by SM (19.3 t ha-1). All intercropped systems had higher crude protein content MC1 (96 g kg-1 DM), MC2 (107 g kg-1 DM) and MC3 (120 g kg-1 DM) than the monocrop maize (76 g kg-1 DM). Intercropping of maize with cowpea reduced neutral detergent and acid detergent fiber content of harvested forage, resulting in increased forage digestibility. Intercropping maize with cowpea could substantially increase forage quantity and quality, and decrease requirements for protein supplements as compared with monocrop maize.
neutral detergent fiber, monocrop maize, maize, yield, sowing densities, cowpea, intercropping, monocrop maize, cowpea, yield, quality, crude protein, quality, Keywords: intercropping, monocrop maize, cowpea, yield, quality, intercropping
neutral detergent fiber, monocrop maize, maize, yield, sowing densities, cowpea, intercropping, monocrop maize, cowpea, yield, quality, crude protein, quality, Keywords: intercropping, monocrop maize, cowpea, yield, quality, intercropping
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 27 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts