CoDiet corpus
CoDiet corpus
The CoDiet corpora created as part of a multi-institution collaboration to annotate biomedical literature. The repository contains 5 datasets (zipped) in BioC-JSON formats: CoDiet-Gold-public, 450 full-text documents independently annotated by 2 individuals and any disagreements adjudicated by a third independent person) CoDiet-Gold-private, 50 full-text documents unannotated to be used for benchmarking on Codabench (see link on GitHub) CoDiet-Electrum, 4,445 full-text documents machine-annotated (with post-processing rules) using the Gold-public labels/vocabulary only CoDiet-Silver, 4,445 full-text documents machine-annotated (with post-processing rules) using existing deep learning, rule-based, and dictionary-based methods CoDiet-Bronze, 4,445 full-text documents machine-annotated (without post-processing rules) using existing deep learning, rule-based, and dictionary-based methods If you use this resource, please cite the related works below.
- Imperial College London United Kingdom
- University of Valencia Spain
- CIC bioGUNE Spain
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Greece
- University of Nottingham United Kingdom
dietary methods, Biomedical Research, study methodology, named entity recognition, sample type, microbiome, corpus, gold-standard, proteins, computational methods, Phenotype, Genes, Food, data type, Population Characteristics, Disease, scientific text, model organism, metabolites, Natural Language Processing
dietary methods, Biomedical Research, study methodology, named entity recognition, sample type, microbiome, corpus, gold-standard, proteins, computational methods, Phenotype, Genes, Food, data type, Population Characteristics, Disease, scientific text, model organism, metabolites, Natural Language Processing
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!