Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2018
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2018
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2018
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

FLUXNET: Multimodal infrastructure integrated with land use, freight and logistics

Authors: Robert Broesi; Tertius Hanekamp; Jos Arts;

FLUXNET: Multimodal infrastructure integrated with land use, freight and logistics

Abstract

The foreseen growth of freight transport in Europe asks for the optimization of multimodal transport chains. To guarantee network performance and efficient investment strategies, National Road Authorities (NRAs) will have to be empowered with tools to influence the modal choice by the freight and logistic sector. The traditional focus by NRAs on small-scope infrastructure planning faces difficulties meeting societal challenges and such approach doesn’t consider the drivers of the freight and logistic sector. In the FLUXNET study we develop a toolbox for NRAs that is based on a smart combination of tools for land-use planning and infrastructure planning, considering the driving forces in the freight and logistic sector such as optimizing chain efficiency. The FLUXNET study focuses on practice: an analysis of good practices has been used to construct a preliminary toolbox that was tested in several workshops around Europe with regional infrastructure, logistics and planning experts. This paper discusses the preliminary results of the FLUXNET study. It provides an insight in the development of the toolbox as well as the preliminary results of its application in ‘Test Beds’ in Sweden and the Netherlands. The toolbox will enable road administrations on a national level to improve multimodal use of their networks with respect to the freight and logistic sector. It is based on a smart combination of tools for land use planning and infrastructure planning, considering the driving forces in the freight and logistic sector. This will help NRAs to influence the multimodal choices and interlinkages with spatial planning. The FLUXNET research was commissioned by the Conference of European Directors of Roads (CEDR). A group of four front running countries directed the research: Germany, The Netherlands, Norway and Sweden.

Related Organizations
Keywords

transport and logistics; multimodality; spatial planning; toolbox; integral approach.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 12
  • 4
    views
    12
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
12
Green