Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Sygma
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Sygma
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 8 versions
addClaim

Initial approach to monitoring reporting and verification (MRV) of agroforestry carbon farming in the EU

Authors: LAWSON, Gerry; Monteleone, Daniel; Rocha, Ana; Dupraz, Christian; Hübner, Rico; Torres Guerrero, Carlos Alberto;

Initial approach to monitoring reporting and verification (MRV) of agroforestry carbon farming in the EU

Abstract

Policy Briefing #20 (v4) is much shortened from version 3 (17.9.24) and responds to the draft carbon farming MRV methodologies made available in April/May 2025 to members of the Carbon Removals Expert Group. These outline proposed methodologies to monitor practices involving: a) agriculture and agroforestry on mineral soils, b) tree planting and c) rewetting of peatlands. EURAF is in broad agreement with the proposals apart from the pressing need to reword the “tree planting” methodology as “afforestation, reforestation and settlement tree planting”. This will avoid confusion with the tree planting in agroforestry systems. This Briefing provides comment on definitions, scope, baselines, additionality, sustainability, monitoring tools, permanence, parcel geolocation datasets and a typology of agroforestry. It also suggests a “standard” typology of 30 carbon farming practices, based on LULUCF land use categories, with an additional section for animal husbandry. It is important that CRCF methodologies match those used by Member States in their annual reporting of greenhouse gas emissions to the UNFCCC, and use the most accurate parcel-based reporting possible. The Commission is therefore asked to urge Member States to meet their commitments to provide open access to anonymised IACS geospatial information on agricultural parcels and land use, and in particular to comply with the open API requirements of the High Values Dataset Implementing Regulation (2023). Member States should also move their GHG reporting to true “wall to wall” identification of both agricultural and forestry parcels: facilitating future exchange of information between LULUCF and CRCF carbon farming reporting. Backround and justification for the "Standard List of Carbon Farming Practices" is provided here as Annex 1.

EURAF Policy Briefing #20

Keywords

carbon farming, DigitAF, agroforestry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average