{"references": ["http://faostat.fao.org. Rome: FAO ''Statistical Database''Retrieved July 24, 2013.", "http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul Tuik,''Crop Production Statistics, Retrieved June 06, 2014.", "www.tkihumas.gov.tr .S. Gezgin, ''Bitki Yetistiriciliginde Humik ve Fulvik Asit Kaynagi Olan TKI-Humas'in Kullanimi''. Retrieved July 18,.2013 .", "P.C. De Kock, ''The influence of humic acids on plant growth''. Science, 121: 473-474, 1955.", "D. Vaughan, and I.R. Mc Donald, ''Some effects of humic acid on the cation uptake by parenchyma Tissue''. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8: 415\u2013421, 1976.", "J.C. Lobartini, G.A. Orioli, K.H. Tan, ''Characteristics of soil humic acid fractions separated by ultrafiltraton'', Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 28: 787-796, 1997.", "G. Ferrara, and G. Brunetti, ''Effects of the times of application of a soil humic acid on berry quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cv Italia''. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 8(3): 817-822, 2010.", "A. Akin, ''Investigation on Effects of Different Crop Loading and Leaf Fertilizer Application on the Growth, Grape Yield and Quality in Some Table Grape Varieties''. Selcuk University. Graduate School of Natural Sciences. Soil Department (PhD Thesis), pp: 311, Konya, 2003.", "H. Yasar, ''The Effect Of Humic Acid Applications on Yield, Fruit Charecteristics and Nutrient Uptake Ercis Grape Cultivar''. Y\u00fcz\u00fcnc\u00fcyil University. Graduate School of Natural Sciences. Horticulture Department (Master Thesis), 22 page, Van, 2005.\n[10]\tA. Dardeniz, and I. Kismali, ''The researches on the effects of different crop load on pruning weight, yield and quality of Amasya and Cardinal grape cultivars. Ege \u00dcniv. Agriculture Faculty Publications. 39: 9-16. Bornova-Izmir. (In Turkish), 2002.\n[11]\tE. Abd El-Razek, D. Treutter, M.M.S. Saleh, M. El-Shammaa, A.A. Fouad, N. Abdel-Hamid, and M. Abou-Rawash, ''Effect of defoliation and fruit thinning on fruit quality of 'Crimson Seedless' grape''. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 6(3): 289-295, 2010. \n[12]\tA. Akin, ''Effects of Cluster Reduction, Herbagreen and Humic Acid Applications on Grape Yield and Quality of Horoz Karasi and G\u00f6k \u00fcz\u00fcm Grape Cultivars''. African Journal of Biotechnology. 10 (29): 5593-5600, 2011a.\n[13]\tA. Akin, ''Effects of Cluster Tip Reduction and Some Growth Regulating Applications on Grape Yield and Quality of the M\u00fcsk\u00fcle Grape Variety''. YYU J AGR SCI, 21(2):134-139,2011b. \n[14]\tA. Akin, and A. Sarikaya, ''Effects of Cluster Tip Reduction and Humic Acid Applications on Grape Yield and Quality of Hasandede Grape Variety''. Sakarya University, Journal of Arts and Sciences, 14(1):267-274, 2012.\n[15]\tA. Asgharzade, and M. Babaeian, ''Investigating The Effects of Humic Acid and Acetic Acid Foliar Application on Yield and Leaves Nutrient Content of Grape (Vitis Vinifera)''. African Journal of Microbiology Research, Vol. 6(31), pp. 6049-6054, 2012.\n[16]\tN. Keskin, B. Is\u00e7i, Z. G\u00f6kbayrak, ''Effects Of Cane-Girdling and Cluster and Berry Thinning on Berry Organic Acids of Four Vitis Vinifera L. Table Grape Cultivars''. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 12(6) 2013, 115-125, 2013.\n[17]\tM. Gil, M. Esteruelas, E. Gonza\u00b4lez, N. Kontoudakis, J. Jime\u00b4nez, F. Fort, J. M. Canals, I. Hermos\u00edn-Gutie\u00b4rrez, and F. Zamora, ''Effect of Two Different Treatments for Reducing Grape Yield in Vitis vinifera cv Syrah on Wine Composition and Quality: Berry Thinning versus Cluster Thinning''. J. Agric. Food Chem, 61: (4968-4978), 2013.\n[18]\tM.A. Amerine, and M.V. Cruess, ''The technology of wine making''. The Avi Publishing Comp.,Inc. Westport, Connecticut, U.S.A., 709 pp, 1960.\n[19]\tK.E. Nelson, ''Harvesting and handling California table grapes for market''. Bull. 1913, Univ. California, DANR Publication, Oakland, CA, 1985.\n[20]\tMinolta, ''Precise color communication''. Color control from feeling to instrumentation. Minolta, Co. Ltd., Osaka (Japan), 1994."]}

This study was conducted Ismailoglu grape type (Vitis vinifera L.) and its vine which was aged 15 was grown on its own root in a vegetation period of 2013 in Nevşehir province in Turkey. In this research, it was investigated whether the applications of Control (C), 1/3 cluster tip reduction (1/3 CTR), shoot tip reduction (STR), 1/3 CTR + STR, TKI-HUMAS (TKI-HM) (Soil) (S), TKIHM (Foliar) (F), TKI-HM (S + F), 1/3 CTR + TKI-HM (S), 1/3 CTR + TKI-HM (F), 1/3 CTR + TKI-HM (S+F), STR + TKI-HM (S), STR + TKI-HM (F), STR + TKI-HM (S + F), 1/3 CTR + STR+TKI-HM (S), 1/3 CTR + STR + TKI-HM (F), 1/3 CTR + STR + TKI-HM (S + F) on yield and yield components of Ismailoglu grape type. The results were obtained as the highest fresh grape yield (16.15 kg/vine) with TKI-HM (S), as the highest cluster weight (652.39 g) with 1/3 CTR + STR, as the highest 100 berry weight (419.07 g) with 1/3 CTR + STR + TKI-HM (F), as the highest maturity index (44.06) with 1/3 CTR, as the highest must yield (810.00 ml) with STR + TKI-HM (F), as the highest intensity of L* color (42.04) with TKIHM (S + F), as the highest intensity of a* color (2.60) with 1/3 CTR + TKI-HM (S), as the highest intensity of b* color (7.16) with 1/3 CTR + TKI-HM (S) applications. To increase the fresh grape yield of Ismailoglu grape type can be recommended TKI-HM (S) application.