
This paper intends to explore the impacts and the effects policies enacted by Italian universities had on the research landscape. Since the Declaration of Messina in 2004, Italian universities adopted policies supporting the scholars in approaching Open Access in their work. The concept of Open Science is becoming more and more fundamental in the scientific landscape, from the STEM to the SSH one. The reasons behind the adoption of an OA approach can differ. In Europe, for example, the responsibility falls partially on the shoulder of the European Union and its programmes. This paper will analyse how different universities in Italy approached the topic, enacting a set of policies and regulations, opening their door to Open Science on different levels of their own structure. The work will, in a first moment, develop a desk analysis of the document retrieved directly from the universities. In a second phase, we will try to analyse the impact such policies had on several indicators the literature widely considers of success, or failure, of a scientific effort – i.e., publications, citations, funds. In a third, and final moment of the paper, we will try to face the possible interaction Open Science generated via new infrastructures in the European landscape, presenting projects ad OPERAS which are fostering its development and pursuing a more multi-level approach to scientific research.
bibliometric, open science, impact, staggered, FOS: Social sciences, difference-in-difference, italian universities, academia, Social sciences
bibliometric, open science, impact, staggered, FOS: Social sciences, difference-in-difference, italian universities, academia, Social sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
