Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Open Science in Italian Universities. Advantage or unnecessary policies?

Authors: Iannace, Davide Emanuele;

Open Science in Italian Universities. Advantage or unnecessary policies?

Abstract

This paper intends to explore the impacts and the effects policies enacted by Italian universities had on the research landscape. Since the Declaration of Messina in 2004, Italian universities adopted policies supporting the scholars in approaching Open Access in their work. The concept of Open Science is becoming more and more fundamental in the scientific landscape, from the STEM to the SSH one. The reasons behind the adoption of an OA approach can differ. In Europe, for example, the responsibility falls partially on the shoulder of the European Union and its programmes. This paper will analyse how different universities in Italy approached the topic, enacting a set of policies and regulations, opening their door to Open Science on different levels of their own structure. The work will, in a first moment, develop a desk analysis of the document retrieved directly from the universities. In a second phase, we will try to analyse the impact such policies had on several indicators the literature widely considers of success, or failure, of a scientific effort – i.e., publications, citations, funds. In a third, and final moment of the paper, we will try to face the possible interaction Open Science generated via new infrastructures in the European landscape, presenting projects ad OPERAS which are fostering its development and pursuing a more multi-level approach to scientific research.

Keywords

bibliometric, open science, impact, staggered, FOS: Social sciences, difference-in-difference, italian universities, academia, Social sciences

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities