Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Effect Of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (Pgpr) On Germination, Seedling Growth And Yield Of Maize

Authors: A. Gholami; S. Shahsavani; S. Nezarat;

The Effect Of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (Pgpr) On Germination, Seedling Growth And Yield Of Maize

Abstract

{"references": ["S.C. Wu., Z.H.Cao., Z.G.Li., K.C.Cheung and M.H.Wong,\nEffects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM\nfungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma.vol.125, pp.155-\n166. 2005.", "D. Egamberdiyeva., The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on\ngrowth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Appl. Soil.\nEco.vol.36, pp.184-189. 2007.", "B.Shaharoona., M. Arshad., Z.A. Zahir and A. Khalid, Performance of\nPseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth\nand yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous\nfertilizer. Soil.Biol.Biochem., vol.38,pp.2971-2975.2006.", "N.Mrkovacki, and V. Milic, Use of Azotobacter chroococcum as\npotentially useful in agricultural application. Ann. Microbiol.,\nvol.51,pp.145-158. 2001.", "A.Salantur., A. Ozturk and S. Akten, Growth and yield response of\nspring wheat(Triticum aestivum L.) to inoculation with rhizobacteria.\nPlant. Soil. Environ., vol.52(3),pp.111-118.2006..", "F. Ahmad., I. Ahmad and M.S. Khan,. Screening of free-living\nrhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities.\nMicrobial. Res.,vol. 36,pp.1-9. 2006.", "R.Bharathi.,R.Vivekananthan.,S.Harish.,A.Ramanathan and R.\nSamiyappan, Rhizobacteria-based bio-formulations for the management\nof fruit rot infection in chillies. Crop Protec., vol.23, pp, 835-843. 2004.", "Y.C. Jeun., K.S. Park., C.H. Kim., W.D. Fowler and J.W. Kloepper,\nCytological observations of cucumber plants during induced resistance\nelicited by rhizobacteria. Biol. Contorl., vol.29, pp. 34-42. 2004.", "A. J. Cattelan., P. G. Hartel and J. J .Fuhrmann,.Screening for plant\ngrowth-promoting rhizobacteria to promote early soybean growth. Soil\nSci.Soc.Am. J., vol.63,pp.1670-1680. 1999.\n[10] H.N. Asghar., Z.A. Zahir., M. Arshad and A. Khaliq ,.Relationship\nbetween in vitro production of auxins by rhizobacteria and their growth\npromoting activities in Brassica juncea.L. Bio. Fertil. Soil.,\nvol.35,pp.231-237. 2002.\n[11] Y.Bashan., G.Holguin and L. E. de-Bashan, Azospirillum- plant\nrelationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental\nadvances.Can. J. Microbiol.,vol.50, pp.521-577. 2004.\n[12] J.C. Biswas., L.K. Ladha and F.B.Dazzo, Rhizobia inoculation improves\nnutrient uptake and growth of lowland rice. J. Soil. Sci., vol.64,pp.1644-\n1650. 2000.\n[13] K.Shaukat.,S.Affrasayab and S.Hasnain, Growth responses of\nHelianthus annus to plant growth promoting rhizobacteria used as a\nbiofertilizer., J.Agri.Res.,vol.1(6),pp.573-581. 2006a\n[14] B.R. Glick., L. Changping., G. Sibdas and E.B. Dumbroff, Early\ndevelopment of canola seedlings in the presence of the plant growthpromoting\nrhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2. Soil Biol.\nBiochem.,vol.29,pp.1233-1239. 1997\n[15] J. R. de Freitas, and J. J. Germida, Growth promotion of winter wheat by\nfluorescent pseudomonads under growth chamber conditions. Soil. Biol.\nBiochem.,vol.24,pp. 1127-1135. 1992\n[16] M. I. Frommel., J. Nowak and G. Lazarovits, Treatment of potato tubers\nwith a growth promoting Pseudomonas sp.: Plant growth responses and\nbacterium distribution in the rhizosphere. Plant .Soil.,vol.150 (1),pp.51-\n60. 1993\n[17] Y.Bashan., Y. Ream., H.L. Levanony and A. Sade, Non specific\nresponse in plant growth yields and root colonization of non cereal crop\nplants to inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense cd. Can.J.Bot.,vol.\n67,pp.1317-1324. 1989.\n[18] R.I.Cakmakc., D,F.Ayd\u2500\u2592n and A.F.Sahin, Growth promotion of plants by\nplant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two\ndifferent field soil conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem.,vol.38,pp.1482-1487.\n2006\n[19] A.A. Abdul Baki, and J.D. Anderson,.Vigor determination in soybean\nseed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci., vol.13,pp. 630-633. 1973.\n[20] F.Ruget., R. Bonhomme and M. Chartier, Estimation simple de la\nsurface foliaire de plantes de mais en croissance. Agronomie.,vol.16,pp.\n553-562. 1996.\n[21] B.Lugtenberg., T. Chin-A-Woeng and G. Bloemberg, Microbe-plant\ninteractions: principles and mechanisms. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek\n.,vol.81,pp. 373-383. 2002.\n[22] N.S. Raju., S. R. Niranjana., G. R. Janardhana., H. S. Prakash., H.\nS.Shetty and S.B. Mathur, Improvement of seed quality and field\nemergence of Fusarium moniliforme infected sorghum seeds using\nbiological agents. J. Sci. Food. Agric., vol.79,pp.206.212. 1999.\n[23] S.R.Niranjan., N.P. Shetty and H.S. Shetty, Seed bio-priming with\nPseudomonas fluorescens isolates enhances growth of pearl millet plants\nand induces resistance against downy\nmildew.J.pest.manage.,vol.50(1),pp.41-48. 2004\n[24] S.R. Niranjan., S.A. Deepak., P. Basavaraju., H.S. Shetty., M.S. Reddy\nand J.W. Kloepper, Comparative performance of formulations of plant\ngrowth promoting rhizobacteria in growth promotion and suppression of\ndowny mildew in pearl millet.Crop Protection., vol.22,pp. 579-\n588.2003.\n[25] K.Shaukat., S.Affrasayab and S.Hasnain,.Growth responses of Triticum\naestivum to plant growth promoting rhizobacteria used as a biofertilizer.\nRes. J. Microbiol., vol.1(4),pp.330-338. 2006b.\n[26] V.Gravel., H.Antoun and R.J. Tweddell, Growth stimulation and fruit\nyield improvement of greenhouse tomato plants by inoculation with\nPseudomonas putida or Trichoderma atroviride: Possible role of indole\nacetic acid (IAA). Soil. Biol. Biochem., vol.39,pp. 1968-1977. 2007.\n[27] J.Kozdroja., J.T. Trevorsb and J.D. van Elsasc, Influence of introduced\npotential biocontrol agents on maize seedling growth and bacterial\ncommunity structure in the rhizosphere. Soil. Biol. Biochem.,vol.36,\npp.1775-1784. 2004.\n[28] A.Vikram., Efficacy of phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from\nvertisols on growth and yield parameters of sorghum.\nRes.J.Microbiol.,vol. 2 (7),pp.550-559. 2007.\n[29] A.Khalid., M. Arshad and Z.A. Zahir, Screening plant growth-promoting\nrhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat.\nJ.Appl.Microbiol.,vol.96(3),pp.473-480. 2004.\n[30] A.Ozturk., O.Caglar and F.Sahin,. Yield response of wheat and barley to\ninoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria at various levels of\nnitrogen fertilization. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci.,vol.166,pp. 262-266.2003.\n[31] M.V. Martinez-Toledo., J. Gonzalez-Lopez., T. de la. Rubia., J. Moreno\nand A.Ramos-Cormenzana, Effect of inoculation with Azotobacter\nchroococcum on nitrogenase activity of Zea mays roots grown in\nagricultural soils under aseptic and non-sterile conditions. Biol. Fertil.\nSoils.,vol.6,pp.170-173. 1988.\n[32] I.A. Siddiqui., and S.S.Shaukat,.Mixtures of plant disease suppressive\nbacteria enhance biological control of multiple tomato pathogens.Biol.\nFertil. Soil, vol.36,pp.260-268. 2002.\n[33] A.Pandy., E.Sharma and L.K.S.Plani, Influence of bacterial inoculation\non maize in upland farming systems of the sikkim himalaya. Soil. Biol.\nBiochm., vol.30(3),pp.379-384. 1998.\n[34] Z.Abbass, and Y. Okon,. Plant growth promotion by Azotobacter paspali\nin the rhizosphere. Soil. Biol. Biochem., vol. 25(8),pp. 1075-1083. 1993.\n[35] G.I.Burd., D.G. Dixon and B.R.Glick, Plant growth promoting\nrhizobacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants.\nCan.J.Microbiol.,vol.33,pp.237-245. 2000.\n[36] S.Dobbelaere., A.Croonenborghs., A.Thys., D.Ptacek., Y.Okon and\nJ.Vanderleyden, Effect of inoculation with wild type Azospirillum\nbrasilense and A. irakense strains on development and nitrogen uptake\nof spring wheat and grain maize. Biol. Fert. Soils. Vol.36(4),pp.284-\n297. 2002.\n[37] S.Dobbelaere., A.Croonenborghs., A.Thys., D.Ptacek., J.Vanderleyden.,\nP.Dutto., C.Labendera-Gonzalez., J.Caballero-Mellado., F. Aguirre., Y.\nKapulnik., S.Brener., S.Burdman., D.Kadouri., S. Sarig and Y. Okon,\nResponse of Agronomically important crops to inoculation with\nAzospirillum. Aust.J.Plant. Physiol., vol.28,pp.871-879. 2001.\n[38] J.W Kloepper, and C.J. Beauchamp, A review of issues related to\nmeasuring of plant roots by bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol., vol.38,pp.\n1219-1232. 1992.\n[39] D.Roesti., R.Gaur., B.N.Johri., G.Imfeld., S.Sharma., K.Kawaljeet and\nM.Aragno, Plant growth stage, fertilizer management and bioinoculation\nof Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting\nrhizobacteria affect the rhizobacterial community structure in rain-fed\nwheat fields. Soil.Biol. Biochem.,vol.38,pp. 1111-1120. 2006.\n[40] E.Yasari., A.M. Patwardhan. Effects of Aztobacter and Azospirillium\ninoculations and chemical fertilizers on growth and productivity of\nCanola.Asi.J.Plant.Sci., vol.6(1),pp.77-82. 2007."]}

The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on seed germination, seedling growth and yield of field grown maize were evaluated in three experiments. In these experiments six bacterial strains include P.putida strain R-168, P.fluorescens strain R-93, P.fluorescens DSM 50090, P.putida DSM291, A.lipoferum DSM 1691, A.brasilense DSM 1690 were used. Results of first study showed seed Inoculation significantly enhanced seed germination and seedling vigour of maize. In second experiment, leaf and shoot dry weight and also leaf surface area significantly were increased by bacterial inoculation in both sterile and non-sterile soil. The results showed that inoculation with bacterial treatments had a more stimulating effect on growth and development of plants in nonsterile than sterile soil. In the third experiment, Inoculation of maize seeds with all bacterial strains significantly increased plant height, 100 seed weight, number of seed per ear and leaf area .The results also showed significant increase in ear and shoot dry weight of maize.

Keywords

PGPR, biofertilizer, Azospirillum, Pseudomonas., Maize

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 43
    download downloads 27
  • 43
    views
    27
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
13
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
43
27
Green