Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Leucandra gossei var. mahonica Topsent 1937

Authors: Van Soest, Rob W. M.;

Leucandra gossei var. mahonica Topsent 1937

Abstract

Leucandra gossei var. mahonica Topsent, 1937 (Fig. 10J) Leucandra gossei var. mahonica Topsent, 1937b: 1, fig. 1. The variety was described by Topsent from Port Mahon, Menorca, the Baleares, approximate coordinates 39.89 N 4.26 E, no depth provided (type material presumably in MNHN). It was erected in an extensive comparison with the typical variety from the Celtic Seas described by Bowerbank 1862: 1095, 1864: 165, figs. 349–350, as Leucogypsia gossei. Syntypes two dried specimens BMNH 1955.11.2.38 and 41 from Sark and Torquay, United Kingdom. The speies was transferred to Leucandra by Haeckel 1872 (2): 177, confirmed by Stephens 1912: 13). Topsent also compared the present variety with the species Leucandra topsenti Breitfuss, 1929: 261 from Concarneau, W of France, approximate coordinates 47.86°N 3.93°W, tidal region (type material not identified, possibly in ZIN-RAS). The differences of the var. mahonica and the typical variety were described as shape and size of the ‘internal’ triactines (sagittal, more robust, and smaller in mahonica, more regular, thinner, and smaller in the typical variety). It is not well established, but it is here assumed to be indicative of different taxa of the subspecies level, so I propose to name this Leucandra gossei subsp. mahonica Topsent, 1937b. Topsent declared Leucandra topsenti also a variety of L. gossei, but in view of the fact L. topsenti lacks giant diactines, whereas its distribution overlaps with L. gossei (cf. Topsent 1937b: 9), I do not follow Topsent in this and prefer to keep L. topsenti as a distinct species.

Published as part of Van Soest, Rob W. M., 2024, Correcting sponge names: nomenclatural update of lower taxa level Porifera, pp. 1-122 in Zootaxa 5398 (1) on pages 94-95, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10494167

Keywords

Leucosolenida, Calcarea, Leucandra gossei var. mahonica topsent, 1937, Animalia, Grantiidae, Leucandra, Biodiversity, Leucandra gossei, Taxonomy, Porifera

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green