Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Reflexive constructions vary from language to language in the way they encode coreference between two clause participants. While some languages employ a form called reflexivizer, others use a non-reflexive form that may perform a coreference function under some conditions. There is also much variation in the types of reflexivizers, spanning from reflexive nominals, voice markers to argument markers, occurring in variable or invariant forms. Additionally, reflexivizers may display coexpression patterns related to self-intensification, auto-benefaction, or valency-changing operations. The aim of this chapter is to investigate some of the main features of reflexive constructions among the world’s languages through a crosslinguistic comparison of the patterns described by the contributors of this book.
Reflexive constructions; Typology; Coreference
Reflexive constructions; Typology; Coreference
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 43 | |
| downloads | 88 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts