Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Data from: Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks

Authors: Juhel, Jean-Baptiste; Vigliola, Laurent; Mouillot, David; Kulbicki, Michel; Letessier, Tom B.; Meeuwig, Jessica J.; Wantiez, Laurent;

Data from: Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks

Abstract

1. Reef sharks are declining worldwide under ever increasing fishing pressure with potential consequences on ecosystem functioning. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are currently one of the management tools to counteract the pervasive impacts of fishing. However, MPAs in which reef sharks are abundant tend to be located in remote and underexploited areas preventing a fair assessment of management effectiveness beyond remoteness from human activities. 2. Here we determine the conditions under which MPAs can effectively protect sharks along a wide gradient of reef accessibility, from the vicinity of a regional capital towards remote areas, using 385 records from Baited Remote Underwater Video Systems (BRUVS) and 2790 Underwater Visual Censuses (UVC) performed in areas open to fishing and inside 15 MPAs across New Caledonia (south-western Pacific). 3. We show that even one of the world’s oldest (43 years), large (172 km²) and most restrictive (no-entry) MPA (Merlet reserve) on coral reefs has between 17.3 % and 45.3% fewer shark species and between 37.2 % and 79.8 % fewer shark abundance than remote areas in a context where sharks are not historically exploited. 4. On coral reefs situated at less than 1 hour of travel time from humans, shark populations are so low in abundance (less than 0.05 individuals per 1000 m²) that their functional roles is severely limited. 5. Synthesis and applications. Remote areas are the last sanctuaries for reef sharks and provide a new baseline to evaluate human impacts with no equivalent close to human activities even in large, old and strongly restrictive MPAs. As such they deserve strong protection efforts. The large and no-entry MPAs close to humans offer limited benefits for reef shark populations but provide more realistic conservation targets for managers of human-dominated reefs. The exclusion of human activities on a sufficiently large area is key to protect reef shark populations. However, this strategy remains difficult to apply in many countries critically depending on reef resources for food security or livelihood.14-Aug-2017

Data_Juhel_JAE_2017Shark abundance and richness in New Caledonia using Baited Remote Underwater Systems (BRUVS) and Underwater Visual Censuses (UVC)

Keywords

Marine protected area, Baited Remote Underwater Video System (BRUVS), Human proximity, Underwater Visual Census (UVC), Pristine coral reef, baseline, elasmobranch

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 14
    download downloads 3
  • 14
    views
    3
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
14
3