Downloads provided by UsageCounts
What an animal eats is a fundamental aspect of its biology, but the evolution of diet has not been studied across animal phylogeny. Here, we performed a large-scale phylogenetic analysis to address three unresolved questions about the evolution of animal diets. (i) Are diets conserved across animal phylogeny? (ii) Does diet influence rates of species proliferation (diversification) among animal phyla? (iii) What was the ancestral diet of animals and major animal clades? We analyzed diet data for 1,087 taxa, proportionally sampled among animal phyla based on the relative species richness of phyla. Our survey suggests that across animals, carnivory is most common (~63%), herbivory less common (~32%), and omnivory relatively rare (~3%). Despite considerable controversy over whether ecological traits are conserved or labile, we found strong conservatism in diet over extraordinarily deep timescales. We found that diet is unrelated to rates of species diversification across animal phyla, contrasting with previous studies showing that herbivory increased diversification within some important groups (e.g. crustaceans, insects, mammals). Finally, we estimated that the ancestor of all animals was most likely carnivorous, as were many major phyla (e.g. arthropods, mollusks, chordates). Remarkably, our results suggest that many carnivorous species living today may have maintained this diet through a continuous series of carnivorous ancestors for >800 million years.
Supplementary MaterialSupplementary_Material.docxDataset S1Dataset S1. Diet data for each taxon in the tree, and supporting referencesDataset S2Time-calibrated animal phylogeny usedDataset S3Diet data for each taxon in the tree, with data modified for four phyla
Comparative studies, Macroevolution, Herbivory
Comparative studies, Macroevolution, Herbivory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts