Downloads provided by UsageCounts
1.Traditionally, trait‐based studies have explored single‐trait‐fitness relationships. However, this approximation in the study of fitness components is often too simplistic, given that fitness is determined by the interplay of multiple traits, which could even lead to multiple functional strategies with comparable fitness (i.e. alternative designs). 2.Here we suggest that an analytical framework using boosted regression trees (BRT) can prove more informative to test hypotheses on trait combinations compared to standard linear models. We use two published datasets for comparisons: a botanical garden dataset with 557 plant species (Herben et al., 2012) and an observational dataset with 83 plant species (Adler et al., 2014). 3.Using the observational dataset, we found that BRTs predict the role of traits on the relative importance of survival, growth, and reproduction for population growth rate better than linear models do. Moreover, we split species cultivated in different habitats within the botanical garden and observed that seed and vegetative reproduction depended on trait combinations in most habitats. Our analyses suggest that, while not all traits impact fitness components to the same degree, it is crucial to consider traits that represent different ecological dimensions. 4.Synthesis:The analysis of trait combinations, and corresponding alternative designs via BRTs, represent a promising approach for understanding and managing functional changes in vegetation composition through measurement of suites of relatively easily measurable traits.
READMEThis file explains all of the variables in each of the datasets that accompany: Pistón N et al., (2019). Multidimensional ecological analyses demonstrate how interactions between functional traits shape fitness and life history strategies.Observational datasetData were obtained from Adler et al. (2014), which used information from the COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database (Salguero-Gómez et al., 2015) and TRY (Kattge et al., 2011).Observational_Dataset.csvBotanicalGarden_DatasetData were obtained from Herben et al. (2012), which used information from LEDA (Kleyer et al., 2008), CLO-PLA3 (Klimešová et al., 2017) and Herben et al. (2017).
alternative design, vegetative reproduction, population growth rate, boosted regression tree (BRT), Elasticity
alternative design, vegetative reproduction, population growth rate, boosted regression tree (BRT), Elasticity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts