Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.3390/rs15082090
handle: 2268/302827 , 2078.1/275241
Understanding crop phenology is crucial for predicting crop yields and identifying potential risks to food security. The objective was to investigate the effectiveness of satellite sensor data, compared to field observations and proximal sensing, in detecting crop phenological stages. Time series data from 122 winter wheat, 99 silage maize, and 77 late potato fields were analyzed during 2015–2017. The spectral signals derived from Digital Hemispherical Photographs (DHP), Disaster Monitoring Constellation (DMC), and Sentinel-2 (S2) were crop-specific and sensor-independent. Models fitted to sensor-derived fAPAR (fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation) demonstrated a higher goodness of fit as compared to fCover (fraction of vegetation cover), with the best model fits obtained for maize, followed by wheat and potato. S2-derived fAPAR showed decreasing variability as the growing season progressed. The use of a double sigmoid model fit allowed defining inflection points corresponding to stem elongation (upward sigmoid) and senescence (downward sigmoid), while the upward endpoint corresponded to canopy closure and the maximum values to flowering and fruit development. Furthermore, increasing the frequency of sensor revisits is beneficial for detecting short-duration crop phenological stages. The results have implications for data assimilation to improve crop yield forecasting and agri-environmental modeling.
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, Technology, STRESS, 550, UNCERTAINTY, 630, VARIABLES, Remote Sensing, remote sensing, Copernicus Sentinel-2 (S2), Geosciences, Multidisciplinary, CLIMATE-CHANGE, precision agriculture, Q, Geology, Agriculture & agronomy, Life sciences, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Physical Sciences, Sciences du vivant, 0406 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, 3701 Atmospheric sciences, precision agriculture; Copernicus Sentinel-2 (S2); disaster monitoring constellation (DMC); digital agriculture; remote sensing; arable cop, 3709 Physical geography and environmental geoscience, digital agriculture, Science, TIME-SERIES, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, Copernicus Sentinel-2 (S2); disaster monitoring constellation (DMC); digital agriculture; remote sensing; arable cop, VALIDATION, 0203 Classical Physics, LANDSAT, arable cop, Agriculture & agronomie, disaster monitoring constellation (DMC), 0909 Geomatic Engineering, FAPAR, ALGORITHM, Imaging Science & Photographic Technology, Science & Technology, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, VEGETATION, 4013 Geomatic engineering, Environmental Sciences
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, Technology, STRESS, 550, UNCERTAINTY, 630, VARIABLES, Remote Sensing, remote sensing, Copernicus Sentinel-2 (S2), Geosciences, Multidisciplinary, CLIMATE-CHANGE, precision agriculture, Q, Geology, Agriculture & agronomy, Life sciences, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Physical Sciences, Sciences du vivant, 0406 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, 3701 Atmospheric sciences, precision agriculture; Copernicus Sentinel-2 (S2); disaster monitoring constellation (DMC); digital agriculture; remote sensing; arable cop, 3709 Physical geography and environmental geoscience, digital agriculture, Science, TIME-SERIES, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, Copernicus Sentinel-2 (S2); disaster monitoring constellation (DMC); digital agriculture; remote sensing; arable cop, VALIDATION, 0203 Classical Physics, LANDSAT, arable cop, Agriculture & agronomie, disaster monitoring constellation (DMC), 0909 Geomatic Engineering, FAPAR, ALGORITHM, Imaging Science & Photographic Technology, Science & Technology, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, VEGETATION, 4013 Geomatic engineering, Environmental Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts