Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Abstract The volatile fraction plays an important role on the organoleptic properties and overall acceptability of fruit juices. This work reports for first time a non-targeted approach for the analysis of the volatile fraction of fruit juice by stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE 1 ) in liquid and vapour phase (HSSE 2 ) at three extraction times (30, 60, and 120 min), two temperatures (room temperature and 40 °C), and two sample volumes (5 and 10 mL). The resultant volatile profiles were compared with solvent-assisted flavour evaporation (SAFE 3 ) and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME 4 ). SBSE and HSSE enabled the detection and identification of more compounds than HS-SPME and less than SAFE. Compared with classic extraction methods, SBSE did not use organic solvents, was easier to perform, required less than two hours and exhibited the highest reproducibility. SBSE allowed the semi-quantification of esters, ketones, terpenes, alcohols known as key aroma compounds in juice. Moreover it was the only method resulting in the identification of n-dodecanoic, n-tetradecanoic, n-pentadecanoic and n-hexadecanoic acids and the best one to recover other compounds of particular interest in fruit juices such as nootkatone.
profile, aroma compounds, gc-ms, south-african wines, 630, Extraction comparison, vinegars, [SDV.AEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition, 615, active compounds, spme, samples, Fruit juice, constituents, [SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition, Fruit juice; Aroma compounds; Extraction comparison, chromatography-mass-spectrometry
profile, aroma compounds, gc-ms, south-african wines, 630, Extraction comparison, vinegars, [SDV.AEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition, 615, active compounds, spme, samples, Fruit juice, constituents, [SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition, Fruit juice; Aroma compounds; Extraction comparison, chromatography-mass-spectrometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts