CLIL vs EMI: Different Approaches or the Same Dog with a Different Collar?
CLIL vs EMI: Different Approaches or the Same Dog with a Different Collar?
This chapter describes the main differences between Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI). The chapter starts with the definition of CLIL and the most relevant studies devoted to the application of this approach to teaching languages and content are described. Then, EMI is also defined and the most important research and findings related to this approach are also discussed. Moreover, the methodologies of CLIL and EMI are compared and the results extracted from several studies are described with the aim of highlighting the differences between the methods and results of these two approaches of language learning. Finally, the differences and similarities between CLIL and EMI are discussed and conclusions are drawn.
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).12 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!