Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Palaeogeography Pala...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Lower Triassic peritidal cyclic limestone: an example of anachronistic carbonate facies from the Great Bank of Guizhou, Nanpanjiang Basin, Guizhou province, South China

Authors: Daniel J Lehrmann; Yang Wan; Jiayong Wei; YouYi Yu; Jiafei Xiao;

Lower Triassic peritidal cyclic limestone: an example of anachronistic carbonate facies from the Great Bank of Guizhou, Nanpanjiang Basin, Guizhou province, South China

Abstract

Abstract Most shallow marine sections described from the Lower Triassic formed in mixed carbonate-siliciclastic systems. Shallow marine limestones from an isolated carbonate platform, the Great Bank of Guizhou, in the Nanpanjiang Basin, South China, provide a unique opportunity to examine a pure peritidal carbonate depositional system. The platform had a low-relief bank profile in the Early Triassic with oolite shoals at the margin, shallow-subtidal and peritidal deposits in the interior, and pelagics, debris-flow deposits and turbidites on gentle basin-margin slopes. Interior strata are 265 m thick beginning in the lowermost Triassic with Renalcis biostromes, followed by lime mudstone, oolite, and cyclic peritidal limestone. The cyclic limestone is Olenekian in age, 164 m thick, and contains up to 83 cycles (parasequences). Parasequences are 0.2–7.4 m thick and typically shallow upward from subtidal oolite grainstone and skeletal packstone facies followed by Renalcis reef mounds or biostromes and capped by intertidal flaser-bedded ribbon rock. The skeletal packstone and reef mounds contain a low-diversity biota of cyanobacteria, echinoderms, bivalves, gastropods, lingulid brachiopods, spirorbids, and ostracodes. Ribbon rock contains alternating lime mud and fine peloidal packstone and grainstone laminae, scour surfaces, ripple cross lamination, lime-mud drapes, and minor prism cracks. Parasequence stacking patterns exhibit gradual increase and decrease of parasequence thickness, defining a third-order sequence boundary and several 4th-order parasequence sets that correlate between interior sections. Parasequence stacking patterns similar to those of Lower Palaeozoic green-house sequences and different from ice-house sequences. The Lower Triassic platform-interior parasequences represent an anachronistic facies in that they are strikingly similar to the common Renalcis -mound, ribbon rock parasequences of the Lower Palaeozoic and different from other Permo–Triassic parasequences (e.g. Capitan shelf parasequences or Loferites). Facies similarities such as Renalcis mounds and flaser-bedded intertidal ribbon rock reflect anomalous oceanic conditions resulting in low biodiversity and low intensity of bioturbation after the end-Permian extinction. Similarities in parasequence stacking patterns reflect low-amplitude, high-frequency sea-level fluctuations resulting from green-house conditions common to the Early Palaeozoic and Early Triassic.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    86
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
86
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!