
pmid: 37994317
pmc: PMC7615324
Low-quality and misleading information online can hijack people’s attention, often by evoking curiosity, outrage, or anger. Resisting certain types of information and actors online requires people to adopt new mental habits that help them avoid being tempted by attention-grabbing and potentially harmful content. We argue that digital information literacy must include the competence of critical ignoring—choosing what to ignore and where to invest one’s limited attentional capacities. We review three types of cognitive strategies for implementing critical ignoring: self-nudging, in which one ignores temptations by removing them from one’s digital environments; lateral reading, in which one vets information by leaving the source and verifying its credibility elsewhere online; and the do-not-feed-the-trolls heuristic, which advises one to not reward malicious actors with attention. We argue that these strategies implementing critical ignoring should be part of school curricula on digital information literacy. Teaching the competence of critical ignoring requires a paradigm shift in educators’ thinking, from a sole focus on the power and promise of paying close attention to an additional emphasis on the power of ignoring. Encouraging students and other online users to embrace critical ignoring can empower them to shield themselves from the excesses, traps, and information disorders of today’s attention economy.
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog, 070, 150, information management, lateral reading, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog; name=TeDCog, digital information literacy, name=Cognitive Science, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science; name=Cognitive Science, name=TeDCog, critical thinking, deliberate ignorance, critical ignoring, online environments
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog, 070, 150, information management, lateral reading, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog; name=TeDCog, digital information literacy, name=Cognitive Science, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science; name=Cognitive Science, name=TeDCog, critical thinking, deliberate ignorance, critical ignoring, online environments
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 70 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
