
This paper discusses an interconnection between diversity and technology: web accessibility for all, including people with disabilities. Qualitative interviews were conducted with eight MLIS professors and two students or recent alumni. Findings showed attitudes regarding teaching web accessibility and recruitment of a diverse student body varied between professors who were familiar with web accessibility and those who were not. Participants who were familiar with web accessibility often thought it should be included within ALA Standards for Accreditation. Findings suggested that, in one school, incorporating diversity in their curriculum, including web accessibility, allowed recruitment of a more diverse student body and was furthering diversity-related curriculum content. At another school, a professor expressed concern about recruiting a diverse student body, particularly students with disabilities. The research suggests that stronger practices for teaching technology, teaching diversity, and recruiting diverse students could assist the field of LIS to further realize its inclusive goals.
bepress|Education|Other Education, bepress|Education|Curriculum and Instruction, Disability and Equity in Education, Communities. Classes. Races, Social and Behavioral Sciences, LIS curricula, diversity, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, Education, SocArXiv|Education|Other Education, disabilities, FOS: Educational sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Library and Information Science, bepress|Education|Disability and Equity in Education, accreditation standardsdiversity, accreditation standards, SocArXiv|Education|Curriculum and Instruction, Curriculum and Instruction, web accessibility, SocArXiv|Education|Disability and Equity in Education, SocArXiv|Education, HT51-1595, bepress|Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Library and Information Science, Other Education, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Library and Information Science, Z
bepress|Education|Other Education, bepress|Education|Curriculum and Instruction, Disability and Equity in Education, Communities. Classes. Races, Social and Behavioral Sciences, LIS curricula, diversity, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, Education, SocArXiv|Education|Other Education, disabilities, FOS: Educational sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Library and Information Science, bepress|Education|Disability and Equity in Education, accreditation standardsdiversity, accreditation standards, SocArXiv|Education|Curriculum and Instruction, Curriculum and Instruction, web accessibility, SocArXiv|Education|Disability and Equity in Education, SocArXiv|Education, HT51-1595, bepress|Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Library and Information Science, Other Education, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Library and Information Science, Z
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
