
Major technical advances were introduced in the study of microflora and microbial communities in the nineties. These are essentially analytical approaches conducted as frequently by brute force. What conclusions can be drawn from these analyses twenty years later? In terms of microbial compositions, monitoring and diagnosis, the results are impressive. But what do all these microorganisms do? What are the factors behind their associations and their maintenance? Gene inventories are approaching completion; they allow us to deepen some physiological processes but do not say much more. We have even begun to manipulate microbiota. But as often in the dialectic between theory and practice, it works but we are far from understanding how!
RNA, Ribosomal, Microbiota, [SDV.BBM.GTP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology/Genomics [q-bio.GN], Animals, Humans, Metagenome, [SDV.GEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics, Metagenomics, Gastrointestinal Microbiome
RNA, Ribosomal, Microbiota, [SDV.BBM.GTP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology/Genomics [q-bio.GN], Animals, Humans, Metagenome, [SDV.GEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics, Metagenomics, Gastrointestinal Microbiome
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
