Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Nematolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Host Suitability of Grain Sorghum Cultivars to Meloidogyne spp.

Authors: B A, Fortnum; R E, Currin;

Host Suitability of Grain Sorghum Cultivars to Meloidogyne spp.

Abstract

Grain sorghum cultivars (Funk G-499GBR, Funk G-611, Funk G-522A, Funk G-522DR, Coker 7723, Coker 7675, Coker 7623, Pioneer B815, Pioneer 8222, Pioneer 8272) were evaluated in the greenhouse for resistance to populations of Meloidogyne incognita race 3, M. arenaria race 2, and M. javanica from South Carolina, and M. arenaria race 1 from Georgia. All the sorghum cultivars were poor hosts or nonhosts of Meloidogyne spp. with fewer than 1 or 2 egg masses per root system in all cultivar x nematode combinations. Sorghum (Coker 7723) planted in a field infested with M. incognita race 3 and M. arenaria race 2 was not galled; however, galling and egg masses were observed on tobacco (Coker 319). Populations of second-stage juveniles at harvest were 2,865 and 72/500 cm(3) soil for the tobacco and sorghum plots, respectively. Sorghum was a poor host of Meloidogyne spp. and may be useful as a rotation crop to reduce populations of root-knot nematodes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold