
handle: 1822/64816
[Excerpt] This paper brings together slightly edited material from previously published articles in which I looked at both Sloterdijk and Anders in direct connection to Heidegger. In those articles I attempted to draw attention to an aspect not only of Heidegger’s, Sloterdijk’s and Anders’s work, but also of the work of authors such as Adorno, Beckett, Derrida, Lacan, and, more recently, Žižek – the aspect of the traumatic. My reflections on the traumatic contained in those articles, tied to Heidegger as they were, were largely concerned with metaphysical or ontological questions. They did not attempt to answer the question of how to establish an ethics of technology. I will now, at the end of this paper, provide some scattered hints on how to address this question in connection with my previous reflections. [...]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
