Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The heterogeneity of sprout inhibitor application with chlorpropham.

Authors: S, Noël; B, Huyghebaert; O, Pigeon; B, Weickmans; O, Mostade;

The heterogeneity of sprout inhibitor application with chlorpropham.

Abstract

The CIPC or chlorpropham is used on potatoes as "sprouting inhibitor". These lasts years, some set of belgian potatoes treated by CIPC exceeded the Maximum Residue Limit (MRL), fixed at 5 mg/kg. The heterogeneity of sprout inhibitor application would be one of the causes of over-dosage. In order to estimate the distribution of CIPC between potatoes, according to the formulation used (DP, EC and HN), a research project financed by "le fond budgétaire des matières premieres" has been set up. In order to evaluate the distribution of CIPC into the pile of potatoes, the efficiency of the different formulations as well as the residues caused by their application on tubers, some tests have been placed in the storage hall. These tests consist in taking off some samples at different places into the pile of potatoes during storage and destocking. The content of CIPC is analysed by capillary gas chromatography with detection by mass spectrometry detection (GC-MS) or nitrogen specific detection (GC-NPD). To estimate the efficiency, the sprouting are observed every month and samples of potatoes are taken off on the top of the pile to control the evolution of CIPC content. Considering the results of the tests, the inhibitor treatment with the formulation DP+HN seems to be the more efficient. As for the residues, the formulation DP leads to a higher content of CIPC than HN, that has a very low concentration. After treatment, the quantity really applied on tubers depends on the formulation used. In fact, 50% of CIPC applied by DP formulation are found on tubers but hardly 10%, after gas application.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chromatography, Gas, Time Factors, Belgium, Plant Growth Regulators, Pesticide Residues, Chlorpropham, Seasons, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Solanum tuberosum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!