
handle: 11585/874264
Complete inventarisation of the marine flora and fauna inhabiting Mljet National Park and mapping of benthic communities, have still not been made 35 years after the National Park was established. Due to that fact, the goal of this survey was to explore the echinofauna in the coastal area of Mljet National Park and to make a check-list of the species imhabiting it. Fifty-nine stations in the littoral area of Mljet Island were explored during the 1995-1998 period. Fifty-five stations were explored by SCUBA-diving , from which thirty-nine stations along the south-western coast of Mljet National Park and Mljet Island and sixteen stations in Mljet Lakes. Samples from one station were collected by the trawl. Samples from old trammel bottom nets were explored at three stations. Fourteen benthic communities were registered in supralittoral, mediolittoral, infralittoral and circalittoral zones. 43 echinoderm species were found, from which 1 Crinoidea, 8 Holothurioidea, 13 Asteroidea, 10 Ophiuroidea and 11 Echinoidea species. Spatial distribution of echinoderms in the area explored depends mostly on the bottom type, on which certain benthic communities are developed. Twenty-eight species were found on rocky bottom while thirty-eight species were found on sandy, detritic and muddy bottoms. The richest communities were Posidonia oceanica meadows (27 species) and community of photophilic algae (24 species). Forty three species found in the explored area are representing about 42 % of the Adriatic Sea echinofauna known at present (101 species). Taking into consideration that most of the stations were explored only by SCUBA diving method up to the depth of 40 m, we can consider ” Mljet” National Park as an area rich with echinoderms species.
Mljet National Park; Echinodermata, Mljet National Partk, Echinodermata; Mljet National Park, Echinodermata
Mljet National Park; Echinodermata, Mljet National Partk, Echinodermata; Mljet National Park, Echinodermata
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
