Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Disponibilidad Léxica en Inglés como Lengua Extranjera: un Estudio Comparativo entre el Alumnado AICLE y no AICLE

Authors: Pascual Aparicio, Sara;

Disponibilidad Léxica en Inglés como Lengua Extranjera: un Estudio Comparativo entre el Alumnado AICLE y no AICLE

Abstract

RESUMEN: El objetivo del estudio que a continuación se presenta es averiguar si la utilización del inglés como lengua vehicular en el aprendizaje de contenidos curriculares (AICLE) está relacionado con una mayor competencia léxica. Para comprobar este hecho se lleva a cabo una prueba de disponibilidad léxica. Con el fin mencionado, se compara el vocabulario producido por cuatro grupos de aprendices pertenecientes a dos centros educativos diferentes que aprenden inglés a través de dos tipos de instrucción: dos grupos con inglés como lengua vehicular (AICLE) más inglés como asignatura, frente a dos grupos con inglés únicamente como asignatura (NO AICLE). Nuestros resultados nos confirman la supremacía del alumnado AICLE, cuya disponibilidad léxica es mayor; producen un mayor número de palabras en todos y cada uno de los campos semánticos testados.

ABSTRACT: The aim of the study hereby presented is to determine whether the use of English in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is related to a higher lexical competence. In order to check this fact a test of lexical availability was carried out. To this end, we compared the vocabulary produced by four different groups of students belonging to two different High Schools and who learn English through two types of instruction: two groups with English as a vehicular language (CLIL) and English as a subject, compared to two groups of students with English as a subject only (NON CLIL). Results confirmed the supremacy of CLIL students, whose lexical availability is higher. They produce a higher number of words in the semantic fields examined.

Máster en Formación del Profesorado de Educación Secundaria

Keywords

CLIL, English, Disponibilidad léxica, Inglés, Lexical availability, AICLE

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 44
    download downloads 1
  • 44
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
44
1
Green
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs: