Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ LAReferencia - Red F...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Estimación de humedad del suelo mediante regresiones lineales múltiples en Llano Brenes

Authors: Palominos Rizzo, Maria Teresa; Villatoro Sánchez, Mario; Alvarado Hernández, Alfredo; Cortés Granados, Víctor; Paguada Pérez, Darwin;

Estimación de humedad del suelo mediante regresiones lineales múltiples en Llano Brenes

Abstract

Introducción. La humedad del suelo es una variable muy importante en el suministro de agua para la agricultura y es su principal recurso. Sin embargo, su medición en campo suele presentar limitaciones, por lo que su predicción es necesaria para diversas actividades de planificación agrícola e investigación. Objetivo. Predecir la humedad diaria del suelo a escala de cultivo, a partir de información meteorológica mediante modelos de regresión lineal múltiple. Materiales y métodos. El estudio se desarrolló en Llano Brenes, Alajuela, Costa Rica. Se instalaron sensores de reflectometría de dominio temporal (TDR) y registraron información cada veinte minutos de humedad de suelo desde noviembre 2018 a diciembre 2019. El suelo se clasificó a nivel taxonómico como Lithic Ustorthents, en una finca con cultivo de café en producción. Se tomaron muestras de suelo no disturbadas para la calibración de los TDR y se realizó un análisis de estabilidad temporal. El primer modelo (RLM1) fue una regresión lineal múltiple con variables meteorológicas, en el segundo modelo (RLM2) además de las variables meteorológicas, se separó la precipitación en subperíodos, los cuales se introdujeron como variables “dummy”, mientras que el tercer modelo (PCA) consistió en un análisis de componentes principales y un modelo de regresión lineal. Resultados. Los modelos RLM2 (R2 = 0,838) y PCA (R2 = 0,823) presentaron un mejor desempeño en comparación con el modelo RLM1 (R2 = 0,540). Sin embargo, el modelo RLM2 se consideró más útil, debido a su simplicidad y a que presentó los mejores indicadores de bondad de ajuste. Conclusión. Los modelos de regresión lineal con variables meteorológicas permitieron estimar la humedad del suelo, debido a que esta tendió a seguir los patrones estacionales y las variaciones de la precipitación, tal como se observó en el RLM2 con la separación de subperíodos

Introduction. Soil moisture is a very important variable in the water supply for agriculture and it is its main resource. However, its field measurement usually has limitations, so its prediction is necessary for various agricultural planning and research activities. Objective. To predict daily soil moisture at the crop scale from meteorological information through multiple linear regression models. Materials and methods. The study was carried out in Llano Brenes, Alajuela, Costa Rica. Time domain reflectometry (TDR) sensors were installed and soil moisture information was recorded every twenty minutes from November 2018 to December 2019. The soil was classified at the taxonomic level as Lithic Ustorthents, in a farm with coffee cultivation in production. Undisturbed soil samples were taken for TDR calibration and a temporal stability analysis was performed. The first model (RLM1) was a multiple linear regression with meteorological variables, in the second model (RLM2) in addition to the meteorological variables, the precipitation was separated into sub-periods which were introduced as dummy variables, while the third model (PCA) consisted of a main component analysis and a linear regression model. Results. The RLM2 (R2 = 0.838) and PCA (R2 = 0.823) models performed better than the RLM1 model (R2 = 0.540). However, the RLM2 model was considered more useful due to its simplicity and the fact that it presented the best goodness-of-fit indicators. Conclusion. The linear regression models with meteorological variables allowed estimating soil moisture, because it tends to follow seasonal patterns and variations in precipitation, as observed in the RLM2 with the separation of sub-periods.

UCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ciencias Agroalimentarias::Centro de Investigaciones Agronómicas (CIA)

UCR::Vicerrectoría de Docencia::Ciencias Sociales::Facultad de Ciencias Sociales::Escuela de Geografía

Universidad de Costa Rica/[]/UCR/Costa Rica

Country
Costa Rica
Related Organizations
Keywords

Tropical zone, Zona tropical, Coffea, Soil water content, Contenido de agua en el suelo

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green