Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Qatar University Ins...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Qatar University Institutional Repository
Article . 1991
Data sources: Qatar University Institutional Repository
 View all 1 versions
Claim

Open-ended cloze procedure and multiple - choice cloze procedure: similarties and differences

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 1991 Qatar English Publisher:Qatar University
Authors: Al-Buainain, Haifa;

handle: 10576/6893

Open-ended cloze procedure and multiple - choice cloze procedure: similarties and differences

Abstract

This paper is a validation of two cloze procedures: Open-Ended and Multiple-Choice (henceforth OE and MC respectively). Open-Ended and Multiple-Choice tests on the same text were administered to 60 English majors in their 2nd year of university level, in Qatar. The subjects were divided randomly into two groups. The first group took Format 1, while the second group took Format 2. The order of the procedures were different on the two formats. Each subject attempted 40 multiple-choice items and 40 open-ended items. Statistics were calculated for the entire groups of 60 subjects as well as separately for the 30 subjects taking Format 1 and the other 30 taking Format 2.

Country
Qatar
Related Organizations
Keywords

English Language

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Beta
SDGs Suggest
sdg_colors
4. Education
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
4. Education,  
Related to Research communities
Knowmad Institut