
doi: 10.14674/ijfs-1794
handle: 10261/385940 , 10459.1/69711
The aim of this research was to evaluate for the first time protein, oil content, fatty acid profile and sugar composition for the main commercial almond cultivars in Tunisia in comparison to foreigners. Thus, fruits from twelve locals and five introduced cultivars from France, Italy and Spain were analyzed over two years. In fact, total oil content varied from 52.28% ('Blanco') to 60.95% ('Lsen Asfour') in the first year and from 47.75% ('Zahaaf') to 56.15% ('Mahsouna') in the second. However, the highest oleic acid content was noted in 'Francoli' (76.2%) for both years. It was followed by 'Sahnoun' (75.11%) firstly and 'Abiodh' (73.02%) secondly. Likewise, the highest linoleic acid content was observed in 'Porto' for both studied years (22.87% and 23.67%). The highest palmitic acid content was detected in 'Porto' (7.02%) and in 'Tuono' for the consecutive years. Sugars profile was quite distinctive among cultivars. The cultivar 'Porto' presented the highest total sugars (5.8 g/100g DW) and sucrose contents (4.96 g/100g DW). Nevertheless, protein content doesn't show extreme values. For both years, the local cultivar 'Zahaaf' presented the highest protein content (27 g/100g DW) while introduced French cultivar 'Fournat de Breznaud' presented the lowest protein content (17 g/100g DW). All the analyzed components were different significantly according to cultivar and year effects. Results evidenced that the local Tunisian cultivars are highly rich in oil and fatty acids particularly oleic and linoleic acids, confirm the almond kernel as a high nutritional dietetic source and underline the high adaptability of some introduction
Peer reviewed
Prunus dulcis L., Oil quality, cultivars, Local cultivars, Fatty acids, olive oil phenols, Fatty acid composition, Sugar content
Prunus dulcis L., Oil quality, cultivars, Local cultivars, Fatty acids, olive oil phenols, Fatty acid composition, Sugar content
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
