Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/38122
This work presents several developed computer-vision-based methods for the estimation of percentages of weed, crop and soil present in an image showing a region of interest of the crop field. The visual detection of weed, crop and soil is an arduous task due to physical similarities between weeds and crop and to the natural and therefore complex environments (with non controlled illumination) encountered. The image processing was divided in three different stages at which each different agricultural element is extracted:1-Segmentation of vegetation against non-vegetation (soil), 2-Crop row elimination (crop) and 3-Weed extraction (weed). For each stage, different and interchangeable methods are proposed, each one using a series of input parameters which value can be changed for further refining the processing. A genetic algorithm was then used to find the best value of parameters and method combination for different sets of images. The whole system was tested on several images from different years and fields, resulting in an average correlation coefficient with real data (biomass) of 84%, with up to 96% correlation using the best methods on winter cereal images and of up to 84% on maize images. Moreover, the method’s low computational complexity leads to the possibility, as future work, of adapting them to real-time processing.
The Spanish Ministry of Education and Science provides full and continuing support for this re- search work through projects AGL2005-06180-C03- 03, CICYT-DPI-2006-14497 and PRICIT-CAM- P-DPI-000176-0505 (ROBOCITY2030)
21 páginas, figuras y tablas estadísticas
Peer reviewed
Precision agriculture, Computer Vision, Genetic Algorithms, Parameter Setting, Precision Agriculture, Genetic algorithms, Weed Detection, Computer vision
Precision agriculture, Computer Vision, Genetic Algorithms, Parameter Setting, Precision Agriculture, Genetic algorithms, Weed Detection, Computer vision
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 59 |

Views provided by UsageCounts