Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Until recently, most ecological network analyses investigating the effects of species’ declines and extinctions have focused on a single type of interaction (e.g. feeding). In nature, however, diverse interactions co-occur, each of them forming a layer of a ‘multilayer’ network. Data including information on multiple interaction types has recently started to emerge, giving us the opportunity to have a first glance at possible commonalities in the structure of these networks. We studied the structural features of 44 tripartite ecological networks from the literature, each composed of two layers of interactions (e.g. herbivory and pollination), and investigated their robustness to species losses. Considering two interactions simultaneously, we found that the robustness of the whole community is a combination of the robustness of the two ecological networks composing it. The way in which the layers of interactions are connected to each other affects the interdependence of their robustness. In many networks, this interdependence is low, suggesting that restoration efforts would not automatically propagate through the whole community. Our results highlight the importance of considering multiple interactions simultaneously to better gauge the robustness of ecological communities to species loss and to more reliably identify key species that are important for the persistence of ecological communities.
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, 570, pollination, QH301-705.5, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], [SDV.BID]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity, diversity, [SDV.EE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, [SDE.ES] Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, Herbivory, Biology (General), [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, Pollination, Ecosystem, stability, Food-web structure, Biota, [SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], [SDV.EE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment, networks, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, environment, [SDV.BID] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity, Research Article
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, 570, pollination, QH301-705.5, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], [SDV.BID]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity, diversity, [SDV.EE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, [SDE.ES] Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, Herbivory, Biology (General), [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, Pollination, Ecosystem, stability, Food-web structure, Biota, [SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], [SDV.EE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment, networks, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, environment, [SDV.BID] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 24 | |
| downloads | 30 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts