Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1111/faf.12257
handle: 10261/350532 , 10037/13695 , 11250/2476685 , 20.500.14243/352278 , 2164/11342
doi: 10.1111/faf.12257
handle: 10261/350532 , 10037/13695 , 11250/2476685 , 20.500.14243/352278 , 2164/11342
AbstractWe present a framework for results‐based management (RBM) of commercial fisheries. The core idea of RBM is to reduce micromanagement by delegating management responsibility to resource users. The RBM framework represents an industrial organization approach to co‐management and comprises three defining processes, conducted by three independent “agents”: (i) an “authority” defines specific and measurable and achievable objectives (outcome targets, OTs) for the utilization of fisheries resources, (ii) resource user organizations (termed “operators”) take responsibility for achieving these OTs and provide documentation that (iii) allows independent “auditors” to evaluate the achievement of OTs. Using incentive mechanisms, notably deregulation, RBM grants operators the flexibility to develop and implement innovative and cost‐effective ways to achieve OTs. The feasibility of implementing RBM in five European fisheries was investigated in cooperation with relevant stakeholders through artificial planning processes and computer simulations. The operators involved were enthusiastic, and new management plans were drafted based on the framework. These included socioeconomic OTs in addition to traditional stock objectives, encompassing an ecosystem approach. Several issues are in need of further research to consolidate the approach and prepare the ground for practical implementation, including: the specification of the legal and regulatory framework required to underpin RBM, details of transitional arrangements when shifting towards RBM (including cost‐sharing) and the development of necessary organizational capacity for operators. Initially, we therefore envisage the framework being applied to high‐value single‐species fisheries, with a limited number of participants, which are adequately represented by a competent organization.
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920, co-management, results based management, VDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210, QH301 Biology, VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Bedriftsøkonomi: 213, Burden of proof, 004, VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210, Common Fisheries Policy, results-based management, QH301, the EcoFishMan project, 265401, burden of proof; co-management; Common Fisheries Policy; results-based management; the EcoFishMan project, European Commission, burden of proof, VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Fiskerifag: 920, VDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Business: 213
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920, co-management, results based management, VDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210, QH301 Biology, VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Bedriftsøkonomi: 213, Burden of proof, 004, VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210, Common Fisheries Policy, results-based management, QH301, the EcoFishMan project, 265401, burden of proof; co-management; Common Fisheries Policy; results-based management; the EcoFishMan project, European Commission, burden of proof, VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Fiskerifag: 920, VDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Business: 213
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 50 | |
| downloads | 103 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts