Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1111/jzo.13027
handle: 10261/341962 , 10612/27308
AbstractTraditional agro‐pastoral practices are more beneficial for biodiversity than intensified agricultural systems. Promotion of the growth of natural herbaceous vegetation in pastoral fields can enhance rodent populations and consequently influence ecological aspects of carnivores with rodent‐based diets, like prey consumption in the European wildcat (Felis silvestris). In this article, we investigated the effects of pastoral field extent, season and prey abundance on wildcat consumption of several prey species in the Cantabrian Mountains (NW Spain). Prey consumption in areas with presence of pastoral fields (even in low proportions) was dominated by profitable field‐dwelling rodent species such as Arvicola monticola. Consumption of Arvicola was not correlated with its abundance and was higher during summer and autumn. Apodemus dominated the wildcat diet in areas with higher forest proportion and far from pastoral fields, particularly during spring. Our results suggest that varying habitat use and seasonal changes in prey accessibility may determine wildcat prey consumption in pastoral landscapes. Our results can contribute to highlight the potential benefits of traditional and sustainable pastoral activities for the conservation of the European wildcat across its distribution range.
Feeding ecology, Felis silvestris, Landscape structure, 2401.02 Comportamiento Animal, Pastoral fields, European wildcat, Ecología. Medio ambiente, 3105.12 Ordenación y Conservación de la Fauna Silvestre, Agricultural practices, 2401.06 Ecología Animal, Human activities, Arvicola, Zoología, 3105.09 Influencia del Hábitat
Feeding ecology, Felis silvestris, Landscape structure, 2401.02 Comportamiento Animal, Pastoral fields, European wildcat, Ecología. Medio ambiente, 3105.12 Ordenación y Conservación de la Fauna Silvestre, Agricultural practices, 2401.06 Ecología Animal, Human activities, Arvicola, Zoología, 3105.09 Influencia del Hábitat
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 47 | |
| downloads | 73 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts