Downloads provided by UsageCounts
arXiv: 2307.05366
handle: 10481/86722 , 10261/339659 , 1887/4082350
AbstractUniversities face increasing demands to improve their visibility, public outreach, and online presence. There is a broad consensus that scientific reputation significantly increases the attention universities receive. However, in most cases estimates of scientific reputation are based on composite or weighted indicators and absolute positions in university rankings. In this study, we adopt a more granular approach to assessment of universities' scientific performance using a multidimensional set of indicators from the Leiden Ranking and testing their individual effects on university Wikipedia page views. We distinguish between international and local attention and find a positive association between research performance and Wikipedia attention which holds for regions and linguistic areas. Additional analysis shows that productivity, scientific impact, and international collaboration have a curvilinear effect on universities' Wikipedia attention. This finding suggests that there may be other factors than scientific reputation driving the general public's interest in universities. Our study adds to a growing stream of work which views altmetrics as tools to deepen science–society interactions rather than direct measures of impact and recognition of scientific outputs.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, academic reputation, Chinese students, Altmetrics, Performance, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, altmetrics, university rankings, Encyclopedias, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Societal impact, Social Media, scientific capital, Wikipedia
FOS: Computer and information sciences, academic reputation, Chinese students, Altmetrics, Performance, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, altmetrics, university rankings, Encyclopedias, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Societal impact, Social Media, scientific capital, Wikipedia
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 77 | |
| downloads | 117 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts