Downloads provided by UsageCounts
SummaryParasitic weeds pose severe constraint on major agricultural crops. Varying levels of resistance have been identified and exploited in the breeding programmes of several crops. However, the level of protection achieved to date is either incomplete or ephemeral. Resistance is mainly determined by the coexistence of several mechanisms controlled by multigenic and quantitative systems. Efficient control of the parasite requires a better understanding of the interaction and their associated resistance mechanisms at the histological, genetic and molecular levels. Application of postgenomic technologies and the use of model plants should improve the understanding of the plant–parasitic plant interaction and drive not only breeding programmes through either marker‐assisted selection (MAS) or transgenesis but also the development of alternative methods to control the parasite. This review presents the current approaches targeting the characterization of resistance mechanisms and explores their potentiality to control parasitic plants.
Genetic Markers, Proteomics, Transcription, Genetic, Quantitative Trait Loci, Resistance Mechanism, Chromosome Mapping, Crop improvement, Model Plant, Breeding, Plants, Plants, Genetically Modified, Host-Parasite Interactions, Parasitic Plant, Model plants, Striga spp., Parasitic plants, Orobanche spp., Plant Physiological Phenomena, Biotechnology
Genetic Markers, Proteomics, Transcription, Genetic, Quantitative Trait Loci, Resistance Mechanism, Chromosome Mapping, Crop improvement, Model Plant, Breeding, Plants, Plants, Genetically Modified, Host-Parasite Interactions, Parasitic Plant, Model plants, Striga spp., Parasitic plants, Orobanche spp., Plant Physiological Phenomena, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 89 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 36 | |
| downloads | 80 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts