Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Wheat flour replacement from 22.5% up to 45% by incorporation of ternary blends of teff (T), green pea (GP) and buckwheat (BW) flours provided technologically viable and acceptable sensory rated multigrain breads with superior nutritional value compared to the 100% wheat flour (WT) counterparts. Blended breads exhibited superior nutritional composition, larger amounts of bioaccessible polyphenols, higher anti-radical activity, and lower and slower starch digestibility. Simultaneous lower rapidly digestible starch (57.1%) and higher slowly digestible starch (12.9%) and resistant starch (2.8%) contents (g per 100g fresh bread), considered suitable nutritional trends for dietary starch fractions, were met by the blend formulated 7.5% T, 15% GP, 15% BK. The associated mixture that replaced 37.5% WT, showed a rather lower extent and slower rate of starch hydrolysis with medium-low values for C∞, and H90, and lowest k, and intermediate expected Glycaemic Index (86). All multigrain breads can be labelled as source of dietary fibre (≥ 3 g dietary fibre/100g bread).
Dietary Fiber, Hydrolysis, Ancient cereals, Flour, Polyphenols, Fabaceae, Starch, Bread, Free Radical Scavengers, Eragrostis, Legumes, Starch hydrolysis, Bread, Legumes, Pseudocereals; Ancient cereals; Starch hydrolysis, Pseudocereals, Glycemic Index, Edible Grain, Nutritive Value, Pisum sativum, Triticum, Fagopyrum
Dietary Fiber, Hydrolysis, Ancient cereals, Flour, Polyphenols, Fabaceae, Starch, Bread, Free Radical Scavengers, Eragrostis, Legumes, Starch hydrolysis, Bread, Legumes, Pseudocereals; Ancient cereals; Starch hydrolysis, Pseudocereals, Glycemic Index, Edible Grain, Nutritive Value, Pisum sativum, Triticum, Fagopyrum
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 58 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 31 | |
| downloads | 131 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts