Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Agronomy
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of pixel- and object-based approaches for mapping wild oat (Avena sterilis) weed patches in wheat fields using QuickBird imagery for site-specific management

Authors: Castillejo González, Isabel L.; Peña Barragán, José Manuel; Jurado-Expósito, Montserrat; Mesas-Carrascosa, Francisco Javier; López Granados, Francisca;

Evaluation of pixel- and object-based approaches for mapping wild oat (Avena sterilis) weed patches in wheat fields using QuickBird imagery for site-specific management

Abstract

This paper compares of pixel- and object-based techniques for mapping wild oat weed patches in wheatfields using multi-spectral QuickBird satellite imagery for site-specific weed management. The researchwas conducted at two levels: (1) at the field level, on 11 and 15 individual infested wheat fields in 2006 and2008, respectively, and (2) on a broader level, by analysing the entire 2006 and 2008 images. To evaluatethe wild oat patches mapping at the field level, both pixel- and object-based image analyses were testedwith six classification algorithms: Parallelepipeds (P), Mahalanobis Distance (MD), Maximum Likelihood(ML), Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT). The resultsshowed that weed patches could be accurately detected with both analyses obtaining global accuraciesbetween 80% and 99% for most of the fields. The MD and SVM classifiers were the most accurate forboth the pixel- and object-based images from 2006 and 2008, respectively. In the broad-scale analysis,all of the wheat fields were identified in the imagery using a multiresolution hierarchical segmentationbased on two scales. The first segmentation scale was classified using the MD and ML algorithms todiscriminate wheat fields from other land uses. Accuracies greater than 85% were obtained for MD and88% for ML for both imagery. A hierarchical analysis was then performed with the second segmentationscale, increasing the accuracies to 93% and 91% for 2006 and 2008 imagery, respectively. Finally, based onthe most accurate results obtained in the field-level study, pixel-based classifications using the MD, MLand SVM algorithms were applied to the wheat fields identified. The results of these broad-level analysesshowed that wild oat patches were accurately discriminated in all the wheat fields present in the entireimages with accuracies greater than 91% for all the classifiers tested.

This work was partially financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through projects AGL2008-04670-CO3-03 and AGL2011-30442-CO2-01 (FEDER). JAE-Doc CSIC FEDER Program financed the work of J.M. Pena.

Peer Reviewed

Country
Spain
Keywords

Broad- and field-level weed mapping, Precision agriculture, Pixel- and object-based image analysis, Herbicide savings, Weeds, Remote sensing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    64
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 29
    download downloads 31
  • 29
    views
    31
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
64
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
29
31
Green