
Language for specific purposes (LSP) has a long history in the language testing literature. An outgrowth of the communicative language movement of the 1970s, LSP testing arose out of the practical need to assess individuals’ abilities to perform specific tasks in academic and professional settings. This historical review traces the evolution of LSP testing in the language testing literature, focusing specifically on theory and research in two key areas: (a) authenticity and (b) the interaction between language knowledge and background knowledge. The review then turns to how Douglas (2000), in the most comprehensive treatment of LSP testing to date, incorporates insights from these two lines of work into his conceptualization. Throughout the review, tensions and debates emerging from the literature are discussed. The final section addresses the uncertain future of LSP in the language testing landscape.
Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol. 17 No. 2 (2017)
LSP, PE1-3729, Language and languages--Ability testing, Theory and practice of education, Applied Linguistics, Language acquisition, Language and languages--Study and teaching, 400, Language for specific purposes, English language, LSP Testing, P118-118.7, Second language acquisition, History of LSP Testing, Applied linguistics, LB5-3640, Sublanguage
LSP, PE1-3729, Language and languages--Ability testing, Theory and practice of education, Applied Linguistics, Language acquisition, Language and languages--Study and teaching, 400, Language for specific purposes, English language, LSP Testing, P118-118.7, Second language acquisition, History of LSP Testing, Applied linguistics, LB5-3640, Sublanguage
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
