
In recent decades, large-scale English language proficiency testing and testing research have seen an increased interest in constructed-response essay-writing items (Aschbacher, 1991; Powers, Burstein, Chodorow, Fowles, & Kukich, 2001; Weigle, 2002). The TOEFL iBT, for example, includes two constructed-response writing tasks, one of which is an integrative task requiring the test-taker to write in response to information delivered both aurally and in written form (Educational Testing Service, n.d.). Similarly, the IELTS academic test requires test-takers to write in response to a question that relates to a chart or graph that the test-taker must read and interpret (International English Language Testing System, n.d.). Theoretical justification for the use of such integrative, constructed-response tasks (i.e., tasks which require the test-taker to draw upon information received through several modalities in support of a communicative function) date back to at least the early 1960’s.
Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol. 11 No. 2 (2011)
English language--Writing--Ability testing, Computer programs, Applied inguistics, English language--Study and teaching--Foreign speakers, Writing, Testing, 370, Teaching language, Communicative competence, PE1-3729, Theory and practice of education, Language acquisition, Education, English language, Grading and marking, Study of language, Ability testing, P118-118.7, Grading and marking (Students)--Computer programs, Communicative competence--Testing, LB5-3640
English language--Writing--Ability testing, Computer programs, Applied inguistics, English language--Study and teaching--Foreign speakers, Writing, Testing, 370, Teaching language, Communicative competence, PE1-3729, Theory and practice of education, Language acquisition, Education, English language, Grading and marking, Study of language, Ability testing, P118-118.7, Grading and marking (Students)--Computer programs, Communicative competence--Testing, LB5-3640
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
