
Background Many studies have revealed the positive impact of mindfulness training on mental health and proposed equanimity as a general outcome in contemplative research. Despite recent interest, relatively few studies have empirically examined equanimity and measurement instruments are still lacking. The main goal of this study was to develop an Equanimity Scale (the EQUA-S) in a Western population with or without meditation experience, based on previous definitions of equanimity, in order to investigate its relations with the relevant psychological constructs and health outcomes. Methods Adults from the general population ( N = 265; M age = 34.81) completed various measures: the EQUA-S, mindfulness, hyper-sensitivity, avoidance and fusion, impulsivity, personality, alexithymia, sensitivity to punishment and reward and frequency of problematic addictive behaviors. The dimensionality of the EQUA-S was examined using Factor Analyses. The convergent validity of this new scale was investigated using Pearson’s Correlations. Results The results of a factor analysis revealed two dimensions of equanimity: an even-minded state of mind (E-MSM) and a hedonic independence (HI) component. While the E-MSM was positively related to emotional stability, adaptive emotional regulation and several mindfulness-related abilities, HI was found to correlate negatively with addictive issues. Discussion The relations with personality constructs and possible related cognitive processes are discussed.
MindRxiv|Medicine and Health Sciences|Psychiatry and Psychology, Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie, QH301-705.5, [SDV.MHEP.PSM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Psychiatrics and mental health, 150, Even-minded state of mind, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychology, Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, [SHS.PSY] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, Medicine and Health Sciences, Biology (General), MindRxiv|Medicine and Health Sciences|Psychiatry and Psychology|Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Neuroscience (all), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all), MindRxiv|Medicine and Health Sciences, R, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences|Psychiatry and Psychology, Equanimity, Treatment & clinical psychology, Traitement & psychologie clinique, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all), [SDV.MHEP.PSM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Psychiatrics and mental health, Social & behavioral sciences, psychology, EQUA-S, Medicine, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences|Psychiatry and Psychology|Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Hedonic independence, Emotional regulation, Mindfulness
MindRxiv|Medicine and Health Sciences|Psychiatry and Psychology, Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie, QH301-705.5, [SDV.MHEP.PSM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Psychiatrics and mental health, 150, Even-minded state of mind, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychology, Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, [SHS.PSY] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, Medicine and Health Sciences, Biology (General), MindRxiv|Medicine and Health Sciences|Psychiatry and Psychology|Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Neuroscience (all), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all), MindRxiv|Medicine and Health Sciences, R, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences|Psychiatry and Psychology, Equanimity, Treatment & clinical psychology, Traitement & psychologie clinique, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all), [SDV.MHEP.PSM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Psychiatrics and mental health, Social & behavioral sciences, psychology, EQUA-S, Medicine, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences|Psychiatry and Psychology|Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Hedonic independence, Emotional regulation, Mindfulness
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
