
These days, we are constantly expecting more from the performance of the building envelope with regard to both comfort and ecological compatibility. Operational energy has been undergoing significant improvement, which in turn draws attention to the building matter: If a standard building does not consume energy in its operation, then it is the building material that impacts the level of environmental compatibility. Designing with used building matter offers an opportunity to decrease emissions from extraction, preserve primary resources and reduce landfill. On top of that, the EU waste directive requires all new construction to have a recycling concept for 70% of the building mass (Commission, 2013). This paper deals with a new approach to deconstructing used building elements and re-introducing them in new construction on a regional scale. A well-connected network of stakeholders increases the regional recycling potential. On a technical scale, the deconstruction process needs to be improved so that it becomes more safe and economically competitive. Robotic disassembly shows great potential to simplify the process and restore high valuable recycling. Deconstruction processes can be arranged in a mobile way with a wide range of tools. Such tools can be equipped to relate to the flexible layout of machines, thus allowing individualized adaptation to the building envelope.
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): Special Issue ICBEST Istanbul
690, Building construction, Circular building economy, stakeholder analysis, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/690, sustainable design, resource-efficient building material, NA1-9428, robotic disassembly, Architecture, TH1-9745
690, Building construction, Circular building economy, stakeholder analysis, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/690, sustainable design, resource-efficient building material, NA1-9428, robotic disassembly, Architecture, TH1-9745
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
