Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.5...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5772/intech...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Bioprotection in winemaking

Authors: Hervé Alexandre; Maëlys Puyo; Raphaëlle Tourdot-Maréchal;

Bioprotection in winemaking

Abstract

Bioprotection in the wine sector is a strategy for protecting grape musts that have been used for a few years now. Bioprotection is intended to be a partial or total alternative to the use of sulfites. The principle of bioprotection consists in providing, from the harvest, on the grapes or on the grape must, yeast biomass, which, by its action, will limit the development of the native microbial flora and consequently avoid microbiological alterations at the early stages of the winemaking process. Most often, the biomasses studied are selected strains of non-Saccharomyces such as Torulaspora delbrueckii or Metschnikowia pulcherrima, but the Saccharomyces cerevisiae species can also be used. We propose to present the results of bioprotection used in white and red wine processes obtained in recent years and to underline the limits of this technique. Finally, a section will be devoted to describing proven or potential mechanisms that may explain how the biomass provided limits the development of native flora. Finally, the perspectives on the use of bioprotection in must and wine will be discussed.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
hybrid