
The lived experience associated with the emergence of a new idea has been little studied. An empirical approach consisting in gathering precise descriptions of the ideation process of scientists, as well as their process of expression, led us to explore a deeply pre-reflected, gestural and transmodal dimension of experience that seems to be the very source of meaning. After describing our research method, we present the results of our survey, and then describe the structural characteristics of this dimension. We conclude with a number of lines of thought on the pedagogical and epistemological consequences of the recognition of the gestural character of meaning.
[SHS.PSY] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, Meaning, [SHS.PHIL] Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy, [SHS.EDU] Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, Phenomenology, Micro-phenomenology
[SHS.PSY] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, Meaning, [SHS.PHIL] Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy, [SHS.EDU] Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, Phenomenology, Micro-phenomenology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
