
doi: 10.5705/ss.2014.252
Summary: An empirical likelihood method was proposed in [the first and the last author, J. Time Ser. Anal. 35, No. 3, 282--297 (2014; Zbl 1302.62187)] to construct a unified interval estimation for the coefficient in an AR(1) model, regardless of whether the sequence was stationary or near integrated. The error term, however, was assumed independent, and this method fails when the errors are dependent. Testing for a unit root in an AR(1) model has been studied in the literature for dependent errors, but existing methods cannot be used to test for a near unit root. In this paper, assuming the errors are governed by an \(\mathrm{AR}(p)\) process, we exploit the efficient empirical likelihood method to give a unified interval for the coefficient by taking the structure of errors into account. Furthermore, a jackknife empirical likelihood method is proposed to reduce the computation of the empirical likelihood method when the order in the AR errors is not small. A simulation study is conducted to examine the finite sample behavior of the proposed methods.
Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH), Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions, AR model, empirical likelihood, jackknife empirical likelihood method, weighted score, Non-Markovian processes: estimation, Nonparametric estimation
Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH), Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions, AR model, empirical likelihood, jackknife empirical likelihood method, weighted score, Non-Markovian processes: estimation, Nonparametric estimation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
