Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revija za Sociologij...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revija za Sociologiju
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revija za Sociologiju
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Empirijska verifikacija tipologije ateizma

Empirical Verification of a Typology of Atheism
Authors: Jakšić, Jelena; Klasnić, Ksenija; Čulig, Benjamin;

Empirijska verifikacija tipologije ateizma

Abstract

Starting from the assumption that atheism as a personal conviction – in a similar way to religious belief – may appear in different forms, the basic aim of this paper was to verify the hypothesis on the existence of 7 different types of atheists, which resulted with preliminary scientific survey research conducted in 2008th on a stratified proportional quota sample (N = 353) of students at the University of Zagreb. The research has shown that it is possible to talk about 5 types of atheists: rational type, positivistic type, anti-theist type, fatalist type and admirer of force majeure. The rational type is absolutely convinced in the absence of God and believes that religion is a set of meaningless settings and logical inconsistencies. The positivistic type blindly believes in science. He/she also believes that science will one day explain the meaning of all existing. The anti-religious oriented atheist or anti-theist type is not even interested in cognitive issues, or in questions of meaning; instead, he/she is primarily interested in the personal social environment. This type usually spends time with atheists, considering them more intelligent than believers. The fatalist type is neither a classic atheist nor a believer. Instead of faith in God, this type is prone to another kind of belief. He/she believes in fate and he/she looks for answers in horoscopes and similar sources of alternative explanations of his/her own life and the lives of people around him. The admirer of force majeure is a cognitive relativist, a believer in the existence of force majeure. The only type determined in the research which is considered to be a “real” atheist is – the rational atheist. All others are merely different types of alternative believers.

Temeljna ideja ovog rada jest da se ateističko uvjerenje – na sličan način kao i religijsko – može pojaviti u različitim oblicima i klasificirati na različite načine. U tu svrhu pokušalo se empirijski provjeriti hipotezu o postojanju sedam različitih tipova ateističkog uvjerenja. Tijekom 2008. godine provedeno je preliminarno znanstveno istraživanje metodom ankete na stratificiranome proporcionalnom kvotnom uzorku (N = 353) studenata i studentica Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Istraživanje je pokazalo da je moguće govoriti o pet tipova ateista: racionalist, pozitivist, antiteist, sudbinist i štovatelj Više sile. Ateist racionalist apsolutno je siguran u nepostojanje Boga te smatra da je religija skup besmislenih postavki i logičkih nedosljednosti. Ateist pozitivist slijepo vjeruje u znanost i drži da će znanost jednog dana objasniti smisao svega postojećeg. Antireligijski orijentiran ateist ili antiteist nije zainteresiran za spoznajna pitanja, kao ni za pitanja smisla postojećeg; njega zanima društveno okruženje. On se obično druži s ateistima, smatrajući ih inteligentnijima od vjernika. Ateist sudbinist nije ni klasičan ateist niti je vjernik. Umjesto vjere u Boga on vjeruje u sudbinu, a objašnjenje svega što mu se događa traži u horoskopima i sličnim alternativnim izvorima objašnjenja vlastitog života i života ljudi oko sebe. Štovatelj Više sile spoznajni je relativist, koji vjeruje u postojanje Više sile. Zaključak je da je jedini »pravi« tip ateista ateist racionalist, dok su svi ostali samo različiti tipovi alternativnog uvjerenja, po strukturi analogni religijskom uvjerenju.

Country
Croatia
Keywords

atheist admirer of force majeure, atheism, atheist fatalist, ateist racionalist, anti-theist, ateizam, ateist štovatelj Više sile, tipovi ateista, ateist sudbinist, SOCIAL SCIENCES. Sociology., positivistic atheist, ateist pozitivist, types of atheists, DRUŠTVENE ZNANOSTI. Sociologija., rational atheist, antiteist

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Published in a Diamond OA journal
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities