
handle: 20.500.12556/RUL-154942
The integration of sustainable and digital competences in educational programmes is vital for shaping a promising future. Through interviews and analysis, we assessed the inclusion of green and digital (industry 4.0 and ambient assisted living) topics in wood science and technology educational programmes across different European countries. Our research revealed disparities in vertical alignment within countries and deviations among similar programs across countries. With the help of fuzzy logic and by using Data Envelopment Analysis, we evaluated the technical efficiency of programs in incorporating these topics in teaching, considering multiplefactors. Results show varying performance levels, with some programs achieving optimal efficiency, while others lagging behind. To improve underperforming programs, prioritizing topic integration is crucial. National coordination and alignment across educational levels are necessary to establish a cohesive system. Equipping individuals with these competences enable them to contribute to sustainable development, leverage digital technologies, and meet societal demands.
education, lesarstvo, digital, zeleno, Forestry, obrazovanje, SD1-669.5, wood science and technology, znanost o drvu i drvna tehnologija, info:eu-repo/classification/udc/630*94, izobraževanje, dea, DEA, Data Envelopment Analysis, green, European Green Deal, digitalno, Evropski zeleni dogovor
education, lesarstvo, digital, zeleno, Forestry, obrazovanje, SD1-669.5, wood science and technology, znanost o drvu i drvna tehnologija, info:eu-repo/classification/udc/630*94, izobraževanje, dea, DEA, Data Envelopment Analysis, green, European Green Deal, digitalno, Evropski zeleni dogovor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
