
Properties of different models of fractional Brownian motions are discussed in detail. We shall collect here several possible ways of introducing and defining various possible fBms, discuss their properties, find how they are similar, and how they differ. In particular, we shall try to find what mechanisms or details in their definitions make these motions anomalous and whether can the various models be distinguished experimentally. To this aim, the main tool used here will be the autocorrelation function C(t,s), and related to it characteristics: nonmarkovian behaviour and so-called weak ergodicity breaking.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
