
The purpose of this article is to review six sources of evidence that might provide insight into what context (e.g. alone versus with others) ought to be emphasised in the promotion of physical activity. In summary, the review of these sources contributes to six conclusions: (a) adults and university students prefer to exercise with others but outside of a structured class setting, although adults also equally prefer to exercise completely alone; (b) context does not appear to play a large role in the propensity to meet recommended guidelines for aerobic physical activity; (c) theoretical propositions support social contexts as superior to individual contexts; (d) adherence to physical activity programmes is superior in social contexts; (e) social support is a strong correlate of sustained physical activity; and (f) protocols adopted in other areas attempting to promote behavioural change suggest that social contexts are superior.
Group Dynamics, Medicine and Health Sciences, Physical Activity
Group Dynamics, Medicine and Health Sciences, Physical Activity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
